|
Leicester
Chronicler A
reflection of past and present thoughts and aspirations |
|
Oral testimony in historical research |
|
Knowing about the past enables us to understand more fully and clearly the present. Oral History (or 'oral testimony') was the original means by which a race, tribe or community passed on the essential stories of its history to new generations in order to preserve its identity for the future.
Oral History is unique amongst
the sources of information available to local historians because
it depends upon a technology of the 20th century, namely the
recording of the human voice. |
![]() |
|
Oral History is a spoken, not a written, form of testimony. It is not a new form of research. Historians from as early as Roman times have recognised its value. Similarly, the collection of oral data is not new, but the easy availability of modern technology in the form of simple to operate recording devices has revolutionised it. More recently Oral History has been encouraged greatly by the `new' universities of the 1960's which were looking for `history from below' approaches which they could promote. |
![]() |
|
|
|
Your Plan of Attack
Decide carefully the limits of your research and don't be tempted to stray beyond those lines. Advertise in the right place to obtain enough subjects to talk to. Make use of existing records in order to save time. These may include, for instance, the personnel records of a factory or the archives of a local newspaper. Organise a preliminary interview in each subject's own environment. People talk more openly and easily if they are relaxed and comfortable and in familiar surroundings. DON'T take a recording device on this first visit. Use the occasion to assess the scope of the interview and value of potential material. During a research period prepare an interview schedule. Organise background reading so that the right questions can be asked. Prepare a running order rather than a rigid questionnaire. Use some visual prompts if appropriate. People will often remember more, and talk more fluently if they are holding an object or artefact relevant to their experiences. Conduct the interview in the respondent's own home and use the best recording device available to you (but one you can use easily, because concentrating on a machine you are not familiar with can be very distracting). Give thought to the environment acoustically in order to achieve a clear recording. The clearest recording will be achieved in a `dead' acoustic where this is little resonance or echo. Look for a furnished room with carpets and curtains and work close to your interviewee in order to reject as much background sound as possible. |
![]() |
|
How you should behave Try to adopt a stance of informed naivety. Don't impose your own opinions or knowledge. Run the interview for as long or as short a time as the material requires. Look for any supplementary documentary material (photographs, documents etc) before leaving. These may help you to understand some of the comments recorded. Following upAfterwards draw up a summary sheet for quick reference to what is on your recording. Later, create a written transcript and an index. Do this while the interview is still fresh in your memory.
Oral History is the major source for providing the details of life affecting
ordinary people, offering facts which are
not normally written down. It gives information on matters not normally discussed in printed
sources when no records were maintained such as the unemployed workers
movement in 1930's, for instance. It is invaluable for the preservation of dialect. Some of the by-products of Oral History recording include artefacts and how they work and their uses.
It is always preferable
to aim for a structured interview in order to make the material
useful and valuable for future listeners.
Dangers
The most likely danger in terms of the validity of
the material you will record are the obvious difficulties in the reliance on oral testimony caused
by the age and attitude of those of older years. Respondents can sometimes mix up memories, and elements of
dishonesty and prejudice can obviously occur.
Cross-referencing of testimonies can clarify matters but oral
testimony is personal, intimate and
individualistic.
|